déséquilibré$1$ - translation to
Diclib.com
ChatGPT AI Dictionary
Enter a word or phrase in any language 👆
Language:

Translation and analysis of words by ChatGPT artificial intelligence

On this page you can get a detailed analysis of a word or phrase, produced by the best artificial intelligence technology to date:

  • how the word is used
  • frequency of use
  • it is used more often in oral or written speech
  • word translation options
  • usage examples (several phrases with translation)
  • etymology

déséquilibré$1$ - translation to

DIVERGENT SERIES
1+1+1+···; 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + · · ·; 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + · · ·; 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + …; 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ...; Zeta(0)
  • alt=A graph showing a line that dips just below the ''y''-axis

déséquilibré      
n. kink

Definition

one
the upper limit of intoxication or exhaustion
after the second pint of gin, i was hard one-ing

Wikipedia

1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯

In mathematics, 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯, also written n = 1 n 0 {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }n^{0}} , n = 1 1 n {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }1^{n}} , or simply n = 1 1 {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }1} , is a divergent series, meaning that its sequence of partial sums does not converge to a limit in the real numbers. The sequence 1n can be thought of as a geometric series with the common ratio 1. Unlike other geometric series with rational ratio (except −1), it converges in neither the real numbers nor in the p-adic numbers for some p. In the context of the extended real number line

n = 1 1 = + , {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }1=+\infty \,,}

since its sequence of partial sums increases monotonically without bound.

Where the sum of n0 occurs in physical applications, it may sometimes be interpreted by zeta function regularization, as the value at s = 0 of the Riemann zeta function:

ζ ( s ) = n = 1 1 n s = 1 1 2 1 s n = 1 ( 1 ) n + 1 n s . {\displaystyle \zeta (s)=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{n^{s}}}={\frac {1}{1-2^{1-s}}}\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {(-1)^{n+1}}{n^{s}}}\,.}

The two formulas given above are not valid at zero however, but the analytic continuation is.

ζ ( s ) = 2 s π s 1   sin ( π s 2 )   Γ ( 1 s )   ζ ( 1 s ) , {\displaystyle \zeta (s)=2^{s}\pi ^{s-1}\ \sin \left({\frac {\pi s}{2}}\right)\ \Gamma (1-s)\ \zeta (1-s)\!,}

Using this one gets (given that Γ(1) = 1),

ζ ( 0 ) = 1 π lim s 0   sin ( π s 2 )   ζ ( 1 s ) = 1 π lim s 0   ( π s 2 π 3 s 3 48 + . . . )   ( 1 s + . . . ) = 1 2 {\displaystyle \zeta (0)={\frac {1}{\pi }}\lim _{s\rightarrow 0}\ \sin \left({\frac {\pi s}{2}}\right)\ \zeta (1-s)={\frac {1}{\pi }}\lim _{s\rightarrow 0}\ \left({\frac {\pi s}{2}}-{\frac {\pi ^{3}s^{3}}{48}}+...\right)\ \left(-{\frac {1}{s}}+...\right)=-{\frac {1}{2}}}

where the power series expansion for ζ(s) about s = 1 follows because ζ(s) has a simple pole of residue one there. In this sense 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯ = ζ(0) = −1/2.

Emilio Elizalde presents a comment from others about the series:

In a short period of less than a year, two distinguished physicists, A. Slavnov and F. Yndurain, gave seminars in Barcelona, about different subjects. It was remarkable that, in both presentations, at some point the speaker addressed the audience with these words: 'As everybody knows, 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯ = −1/2.' Implying maybe: If you do not know this, it is no use to continue listening.